Jump to content

Recent Topics
Recent Facebook Activity
Upcoming Calendar Events
There are no forthcoming calendar events
Recent Status Updates
  • Photo
      15 Oct
    Mia Doll

    If you really want to wear traditional dresses, just start to wear kilts. It’s the heritage of Scotland and resemblance of Scottish culture

View All Updates
November 2018
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30

Next Previous
Photo

Another Stupid Secondary Question


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1
_Mayo

_Mayo

    American MilSim Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 30 posts
What constitutes a gun as a secondary to which you can carry more mags? I understand that pistols, such as HiCapas, Glocks, M&Ps, etc, are recognized as secondaries. However, what about pistols like the KWA MP9 without a stock, for example?

#2
Alex AMS

Alex AMS

    AMS Chief of Staff

  • Administrators
  • 1,095 posts
  • LocationFort Worth, Tx

I would consider that a secondary.


My job is to clarify and enforce policy, not to make policy.


#3
_Mayo

_Mayo

    American MilSim Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 30 posts
That is awesome. What about a MP5K without the stock? That's about the only other one I can think of.

#4
Alex AMS

Alex AMS

    AMS Chief of Staff

  • Administrators
  • 1,095 posts
  • LocationFort Worth, Tx

One is more of a. machine pistol, and one is more of a PDW. I would say that the mp5 would fall under more of a primary. Im probably going to have to define this in some sort of manner.


My job is to clarify and enforce policy, not to make policy.


#5
_Mayo

_Mayo

    American MilSim Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 30 posts
Alrighty brother. You could always use the ATF definition for pistol vs rifle. It would just be a grey area when using pistols with 2 points of contact, like a MP5K without a stock.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users